FEMA Inspector Talk
It's wise to be well advised
FEMA Inspectors Network

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time

Judge sentences ex-FEMA inspector

South Florida Business Journal

Nearly three months after she pleaded guilty, a former FEMA inspector has been sentenced to prison time for receiving bribes,
The government said Tywanishia Preston, who worked in Miami-Dade County, was sentenced before U.S. District Court Judge Joan A. Lenard to one year and one day in prison for receiving bribes in the performance of her duties as a FEMA inspector after Hurricane Frances.
Prosecutors had charged Preston with inflating applicants' claims for FEMA disaster relief exchange for kickbacks from applicants.
She was indicted, Oct. 18, for receipt of bribes by a public official and for making false, fictitious, and fraudulent claims.
April 27, she pleaded guilty to the bribery count.
Hurricane Frances made landfall Sept. 5, 2004, near Sewall's Point, in Martin County, about 100 miles north of Miami-Dade County.
The government said Preston approached victims seeking aid under FEMA's Individuals and Households Program, which provided financial assistance to people who suffered property losses and damage from the storm, and solicited bribes in exchange for fraudulently inflating the value of their claims.
Media reports show Preston was the only FEMA inspector to be charged amid complaints of mismanagement of the $31 million FEMA paid in disaster relief after Hurricane Frances.
The government said she caused FEMA to lose $10,000 and $30,000.
Hurricane Frances wavered in intensity, but made landfall in Florida as a Category 2 hurricane.
As of Aug. 6, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported FEMA had paid Miami-Dade residents more than $31 million for damages from the storm.

43,000 more reasons why FEMA should hire PAFI members as employees and not use Parsons Brinckerhoff or PaRR in their ponzi ploy!

YOUR GOVERNMENT AT WORK
FEMA inspector goes berserk with golf club
74-year-old driver goes after pedestrian with odd weapon

Posted: June 29, 2008
4:08 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily


Vincent Koley

CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa – A FEMA inspector, angered at a pedestrian who got in his way, allegedly took out a golf club, chased the pedestrian down and bashed him across the arm, breaking the club in the process.

According to the Cedar Rapids Gazette, the incident Friday grew out of an argument, which started after the inspector nearly drove over the pedestrian, and ended with witnesses surrounding the car to prevent the inspector from escaping before authorities arrived.

Vincent Koley, 74, of Chapin, S.C., a Federal Emergency Management Agency inspector contracted by FEMA from a Virginia housing inspection company, was driving south along 1st Street SW, only a block from the rain-swollen Cedar River. Shortly before noon, he came to the crosswalk in front of the Penford Products plant at 10th Avenue SW and nearly drove into Penford employee Tom Kramer, 54, of Lisbon, Iowa.

Kramer leaped out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, but then pushed against it and told the driver to slow down.

According to the Cedar Rapids Police Department, Koley stopped the car, got out and insisted that "he didn't have to slow down, he was with FEMA."

(Story continues below)

After an argument, Kramer turned to walk away, but Koley returned to the car, retrieved a golf club and struck Kramer across the arm.

Kramer was not seriously injured, but the Gazette reported that several Penford employees who witnessed the assault surrounded the car to prevent Koley from making a getaway. At one point, according to police, Koley got back in the car and tried to nudge the vehicle through the crowd, nearly running down Kramer a second time.

Koley has been charged with assault with a deadly weapon and booked into the Jones County Jail in nearby Anamosa, Iowa.

Obama Fights for the workers and it may be a good thing for us if he becomes President !

 
Obama for America
 


The Obama-Durbin Independent Contractor Proper Classification Act of 2007
 (The ICPC ACT of 2007) Issue Overview  

Every day, the vast majority of working Americans and their employers get up, go to work, and play by the rules.  They pay their taxes and recognize their responsibilities to each other.  And they recognize that as employers and employees, they are engaged in a common effort to provide goods and services to customers in a competitive marketplace.  And all that they ask for is a fair and level playing field.  But today, a tax loophole tilts the playing field against those playing by the rules.

 

The Section 530 safe harbor in tax law currently encourages some employers to avoid paying their taxes in full and deny their employees basic protections, thereby placing employers who play by the rules at a disadvantage, striping the government of billions in uncollected business taxes, and exposing employees to a loss of overtime, workers compensation, and other protections.  The problem is particularly acute in the construction industry, but it also exists in other growing industries, ranging form high-tech, to trucking, to janitorial services, to home care. 

 

We are introducing the Independent Contractor Proper Classification Act of 2007 (ICPC) to fix the problem and treat all workers and employers properly and fairly.  That should lead to better tax compliance, fair pay and benefits, proper coverage in workers’ compensation, and competition on a level playing field for workers and business.

 

A 2006 University of Missouri study of employee misclassification in Illinois found that between 2001 and 2005 the percentage of misclassified employees in the state went from 5.5% to 8.5%, a 55% increase.  It also estimated that misclassification of workers in 2005 resulted in a $53.7 million loss of unemployment insurance taxes and a $149 million to $250 million loss of income tax, and that $97.9 million in workers’ compensation premiums were not paid properly in 2004.  There are other studies out of New York, Massachusetts, and Maine that show similar outcomes.

 

The way it works is this, an employer can cut its payroll costs by up to 30% if it calls a worker an “independent contractor” instead of an “employee” and issues a Form 1099 instead of Form W-2 to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). As long as it treats like workers the same, the employer does not have to withhold taxes from the worker’s pay, forcing workers to pay all their own payroll taxes as if he or she were self-employed.  And, at the same time, the employers fail to pay their fair share of federal and state payroll taxes.  Section 530 bars the IRS from penalizing the employer if he falls under the safe harbor, requiring a change in the treatment of workers even if the IRS concludes that those workers should be treated as employees, and it bars the IRS from writing rules, regulations and guidance on the matter.

 

Genuine independent contractors make up a small part of the American workforce because, by definition, an independent contractor operates his or her own business.  They have specialized skills, they invest capital in the business, and they perform a new service, not just routine services already that other workers already provide.  Most workers, especially in labor intensive jobs like construction are not operating a business of their own.

 

There are legitimate independent contractors in every industry.  And it is not our intent to undermine their work.  By ensuring that the IRS can require employers to properly classify the people working for them as well as give them guidance on how to do that, we will ensure that both true independent contractors and true employees are treated as such.

 

This legislation will close the Section 530 loophole.  It will allow the government to collect the taxes employers owe and level the playing field for all workers and employers.  The legislation will also address the serious need for more enforcement of federal tax and employment laws to identify those employers in major industries that wrongly classify their workers as independent contactors and require greater cooperation between the IRS and the Department of Labor in enforcing the law.

 

In the end, everyone is a winner.  The vast majority of  employers who pay their fair share of taxes and recognize their workers as employees will be able to compete on a level playing field against employers who will held accountable for cheating the system.  Workers benefit by receiving the basic employment rights of all other employees.  And the “tax gap” is narrowed by collecting literally billions of dollars in unpaid federal taxes that are now denied the federal treasury due to misclassification of independent contractors.

 

Opposition to closing this loophole would favor businesses not complying with their obligations to their workers or complying with their tax obligations over those playing by the rules.  Maintaining the status quo would be a disservice to all employers competing in the marketplace and doing the right thing.

 The Fixes

The legislation we are introducing will end the practice of allowing employers to continue to misclassify workers for employment tax purposes and eliminate the employer’s defense that misclassification is a common practice in the employer’s industry.   Thus, in industries like construction, where especially large numbers of employers misclassify their workers, the safe harbor provision will no longer apply just because it is common practice in the industry to violate federal laws.

 

Also, our legislation allows the IRS to write rules, regulations, and guidance for employers on how to properly classify their employees for employment tax purposes.  Current law bars the IRS from writing rules, regulations, and guidance on this matter.  To help beef up enforcement of existing tax laws, the bill also improves on an IRS procedure that allows individual workers to ask the IRS to make a determination whether they are, in fact, wrongly classified as independent contractors by their employers.

 

Of special significance, the legislation would also require the IRS to communicate with the Department of Labor because employers who misclassify employees for tax purposes, may also be misclassifying workers to avoid compliance with any number of labor laws including minimum wage and overtime pay.  It also requires the DOL to start tracking misclassification cases to get a better handle on the true scope of the problem.

 

Finally, the legislation would require employers to notify independent contractors of their rights, including their right to seek a determination from the IRS about whether they are properly classified as an independent contractor.

 The Scope of the Problem

The GAO has reported that at least 10 million workers in the United States are classified as independent contractors, which is an increase of more than two million workers in just six years.  Other studies have found that as many as 30% of employers misclassify their workers as independent contractors, especially in problem industries like construction.  Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Labor still fails to track how many workers are denied minimum wage and overtime pay despite the rampant problem of misclassification of independent contractors. 

 

A 2006 University of Missouri study of employee misclassification in Illinois found that between 2001 and 2005 the percentage of misclassified employees in the state went from 5.5% to 8.5%, a 55% increase. 

 

While many workers are legitimately employed as independent contractors, those who are not are denied worker’s compensation, overtime pay, and the other benefits due them, while their employers fail to pay their payroll taxes.  And employers playing by the rules should not have to compete with employers who are not playing by the rules.

 

The following studies have quantified the problem:

Ø      NY:  Fiscal Policy Institute, “New York State Workers Compensation: How Big is the Shortfall?” (January 2007), estimated that misclassification of workers amounts to a loss of $500 million to $1 billion annually in evaded workers’ compensation premium;   Ø      IL: Michael Kelsay, James Sturgeon, Kelly Pinkham, “The Economic Costs of Employee Misclassification in the State of Illinois” (Dept of Economics:  University of Missouri-Kansas City:  December 2006), estimated that misclassification of workers in 2005 resulted in a $53.7 million loss of unemployment insurance taxes and a $149 million to $250 million loss of income tax, and that $97.9 million in workers’ compensation premiums were not paid properly in 2004; Ø      NJ: Dept. of Labor & Workforces’s audit in 2005 found $5 million in lost income taxes and $15 million in underpayments to UI and disability funds; Ø      ME: State of Maine, “Annual Report on the Status of the Maine Workers’ Compensation System,” Submitted to the Legislature, February 2005), estimating that for a typical year from 1999-2002, misclassification of workers in the construction industry resulted in a $11,729,009 loss of federal and state tax revenues; Ø      MA: Francois Carre, J.W. McCormack, “The Social and Economic Cost of Employee Misclassification in Construction (Labor and Worklife Program, Harvard Law School and Harvard School of Public Health: December 2004), estimating that misclassification of workers from 2001 - 2003 resulted in an annual $3.4 million to $11.7 million loss in unemployment insurance taxes, a $91 million loss of income tax revenue, and up to $91 million of loss in workers compensation premiums;  The Loophole: Further Background on the Section 530 Safe Harbor & Limited Federal Enforcement

The Section 530 Safe Harbor requires the IRS to excuse misclassification and allow an employer to continue reporting employees as 1099 independent contractors if the employer (1) has been treating similarly situated workers as independent contractors, (2) has been consistently reporting the workers as independent contractors to the IRS and has been issuing 1099’s to the workers or (3) has a reasonable basis to classify employees as subcontractors.  The first two are known as the consistency requirements.

 

A consistent employer still needs to satisfy the reasonable basis test.  The reasonable basis test is satisfied if the employer (a) reasonably relied on a court decision or IRS ruling issued to the employer, (b) was a subject of an IRS employment-classification audit of similarly situated workers and the IRS did not reclassify the workers, and (c) relied on a long-standing practice of a significant segment of the industry.  

 

So an employer can be misclassifying his workers, but as long as he does it consistently and other people in the industry do it too, the IRS can do nothing about it.  And the law also bars the IRS from writing rules, regulations, or guidance on compliance with the law on this issue, thereby further discouraging compliance.

 

Lastly, the U.S. Department of Labor has failed to aggressively enforce the minimum wage and overtime laws to identify and prosecute cases where low-road employers misclassify their workers as independent contractors. Indeed, the agency in charge of enforcing the nation’s wage and hour laws does not even track cases where employers routinely violate the federal law by misclassifying their workers as independent contractors.    

  
 “The Independent Contractor Proper Classification Act of 2007” Section-by-Section Summary Section 1: Title 

Section 2:  Reformation of Safe Harbor to Close its Use as a Tax Loophole

  • Amends Section 530 to allow the IRS to require employers to reclassify workers that they have misclassified in the past.
  • Eliminates the ban on the IRS issuing regulations or revenue rulings on employee/independent contractor status.
  • Eliminates the ability of employers to rely on others in the industry misclassifying employees as a basis for continuing to misclassify their employees.
 Section 3:  Review of Classification Status
  • Directs the IRS to develop a process for workers to ask for an evaluation of their proper classification.
  • It requires safeguards against employer retaliation and payment of attorney’s fees to employees who were misclassified.
  • Directs the IRS to audit employers if an employee requests an evaluation of their classification and the IRS finds that the employee was misclassified; and
  • Directs the IRS to inform the Department of Labor of misclassification practices.
 Section 4: Enforcement and Compliance
  • IRS and DOL are required to issue annual reports on misclassification and their efforts to curtail the practice.
  • Requires the DOL to conduct investigations in industries that IRS data show to have high rates of misclassification for tax purposes and to track cases involving misclassification of independent contractors involving the Wage and Hour Division.
 Section 5: Notice to Employees and Independent Contractors of their Rights and Obligations
  • DOL will provide information on any poster required under the FLSA of the employee right to challenge their status as an independent contractor.
  • Requires each employer to notify any independent contractor of their federal tax obligations as an independent contractor, the labor and employment law protections that do not apply to independent contractors, and the right of the independent contractor to seek a classification determination from the IRS.
  • Requires employers to retain for three years a list of the independent contractors they have hired.

Reader Comments
  
Why is it I have never heard of this/  |  Report to Admin
By Tommy Harris Feb 13th 2008 at 9:20 pm EST
I'm in construction and have noticed the wage drop due to a surplus of eager illegal immigrants who are independant contracters. They work extra hours with no benefit, which many americans won't, for less money because... let's face it, they are making much more money than if they lived in their country. Some sending much of their money back to their country where it is worth up to 20 times what it's worth in this nation. Being an independant contractor they pay no taxes and when the job is over they are free to move to the next job or home with there profit. This is not only slave labor to my eyes but also robbery to our nation. But who will enforce this bill on companies and the laborers who are wrongfully fleecing our nation?
  

November Tax Talk Today Focused on the Importance of Properly Classifying Workers

 

NOTE: This headliner is current through the publication date. Since changes may have occurred, no guarantees are made concerning the technical accuracy after the publication date.


Headliner Volume 218
November 13, 2007

The November Tax Talk Today program, “What’s Hot in Employment Taxes: Independent Contractor or Employee?” was the setting for an informative discussion on worker classification issues.

The webcast opened with an interview with Bill Conlon, IRS Specialty Tax Director. Conlon pointed out that compliance falls off when workers are improperly treated as independent contractors. By inappropriately avoiding employment taxes, businesses also gain an unfair competitive advantage.

The interview was followed by a discussion plus question-and-answer period among panelists Mary C. Gorman, Attorney, IRS Counsel; Richard Schampers, Senior Program Analyst, Employment Tax Policy, IRS; Joseph Tiberio, Program Manager, Employment Tax Policy, IRS; Rebecca Wilson, Attorney, IRS Counsel; Michael P. O'Toole, Esq., Senior Director, Publications and Government Relations, American Payroll Association; and F. Gordon Spoor, CPA/PFS, Spoor & Associates, P.A.

Revolving around the issue of businesses properly classifying workers as employees or independent contractors, the show was extremely timely. According to Tiberio, the IRS will be paying more attention to worker classification issues in FY 2008 as the number of employees being classified as independent contractors is steadily increasing. The show aired on the same day that the IRS announced a new initiative, the Questionable Employment Tax Program (QETP) , between the IRS and 29 states to share information, including tax returns, with state workforce agencies in order to uncover employers who may be misclassifying workers or taking other inappropriate actions involving employment taxes.

The show also provided information about the legislative and legal background of worker classification, Section 530 “safe harbor” relief, proposed legislation concerning worker classification, options for workers who may have been misclassified, like the Form SS-8 and new Form 8919, which allows workers who have been determined to be employees but not treated as such by their employer to report their income and pay their share of FICA and Medicare tax instead of self-employment tax.

If you missed the program, the November 7 webcast is accessible for viewing via archive for 12 months at Tax Talk Today. A transcript of the show is also available, as well as an audio podcast.

Sponsored by the IRS, Tax Talk Today is a free, live, monthly interactive Web cast aimed at educating tax professionals on the most contemporary and complex tax issues. In addition to viewing live webcasts and archived programs, listening to audio podcasts and reading show transcripts, subscribers can order audio and video recordings.

More information on Tax Talk Today, including registration and CPE credits is available at the Tax Talk Today Web site.

Be sure to mark your calendars for the next two shows on Tuesday, December 11, 2007, and Tuesday, January 8, 2008: “Getting Ready for Filing Season 2008,” for individuals and businesses respectively.

References/Related Topics:

  • IR-2007-184 IRS and States to Share Employment Tax Examination Results
  • FS-2007-25 Information on the Questionable Employment Tax Practices Memorandum of Understanding

Rate the Small Business and Self-Employed Web Site

 


IRS is going after Companies who misclassify their workers!

IRS FINES FEDEX $319M FOR "INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR" DODGE

Thursday, January 17, 2008

(PAI)
Press Associates, Inc. (PAI) -- 1/4/2008

IRS FINES FEDEX $319M FOR ‘INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR’ DODGE

    WASHINGTON (PAI)--Employers’ continued efforts to misclassify workers as “independent contractors” and avoid paying Social Security taxes, Medicare, workers’ comp and other benefits just got a $319 million kick in the head.

    That’s how much the Internal Revenue Service fined FedEx in late December for misclassifying 15,000 of its FedEx Ground pickup and delivery drivers as “independent contractors,” the Teamsters reported.

    Not only that, but the problem is so pervasive, the IRS had to create a new form for misclassified workers to fill out to cover Social Security and Medicare taxes their employers should have paid.

    The union, which is trying to organize FedEx, gleefully reported the fine.  The company said it would appeal the ruling.

    Besides the FedEx workers, other “independent contractors” who really aren’t independent abound in the construction industry and among some service industries, such as advertising sales and messengers.

    Teamsters President Jim Hoffa hailed the IRS ruling against “FedEx's illegal independent contractor scam."  Just the day before the IRS ruling, the Massachusetts attorney general also ruled that FedEx Ground illegally misclassified its drivers.  "It's game over” for FedEx, Hoffa added.

    The IRS found the problem of misclassified “independent contractors” is so large that it created new Form 8919 for workers misclassified by their companies.  The form,  “Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages, will now be used to figure and report the employee’s share of uncollected Social Security and Medicare taxes due on their compensation,” the agency explained on Dec. 20--the day of its FedEx ruling.  IRS did not say what it would do about the employer’s share of those levies.

    “Generally, a worker who receives a Form 1099 for services provided as an independent contractor must report the income on Schedule C and pay self-employ-ment tax on the net profit,” IRS explained.  “However, sometimes the worker is incorrectly treated as an independent contractor when they are actually an employee.  When this happens, Form 8919 will be used beginning for tax year 2007 by workers who performed services for an employer but the employer did not withhold the worker’s share of social security and Medicare taxes,” the agency added.

    Workers who have to file the form are those--like the FedEx drivers--who receive letters from the IRS saying they’re really employees and not independent contractors.
###

Racism has no business in Government!

We should all fight Cultural Insensitivity as it leads to the Institutional Racsim that is in our complaint toFEMA and the DHS. Most of the FEMA Inspectors I know do not tolerate it I am proud to say.
"Love thy neighbor as thy self"  should be our motto.
I ask all FEMA Inspectors to report Racism if you see it or experience it. I futher hope that FEMA will provide a Cultural Sensitivity trainging program for all FEMA Inspectors.
Please see the story below in Comments.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Controversial_DHS_Halloween_photos_recovered_0208.html




It's game over for Alltech and PaRR's Independent contractor scam!

Scofflaw Parsons Brinckerhoff/Alltech and Dewberry Davis/PaRR
check out what happened to FED-EX because you will be next.

     So what you going to do when they come for you?

Dec 19, 2007 4:20:00 PM

FedEx Violated Massachusetts' Independent Contractor Law

WASHINGTON, Dec. 19 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has cited FedEx Corporation (NYSE: FDX) subsidiary FedEx Ground for intentionally misclassifying 13 pickup and delivery drivers as independent contractors rather than employees.

Coakley also fined FedEx Ground $190,000 in penalties and ordered the company to fix the employment status and pay the 13 drivers restitution. There are more than 400 drivers for FedEx Ground in Massachusetts, and the AG's office released a press statement today saying the investigation is ongoing.

FedEx has 10 days to appeal the citations to a state administrative law agency. The AG's office began investigating FedEx this summer after receiving a driver's complaint over his employment classification.

"I applaud the just actions taken by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley in targeting the scofflaw FedEx Ground," said Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa. "FedEx Ground has for too long passed unnoticed as it calls its drivers 'independent' but illegally controls them like employees. But FedEx Ground is running out of places to hide. This action in Massachusetts is another nail in the coffin of FedEx's illegal business model."

FedEx Ground and its subsidiary FedEx Home Delivery have lost a series of court decisions, labor board determinations and state agency rulings which found the two companies to be misclassifying its drivers as contractors. Most recently, the California Supreme Court refused to review a California Court of Appeal ruling that found single route drivers in that state to be misclassified. The California Supreme Court action ended seven years of litigation and let stand the civil judgment that drivers were company employees.

"FedEx has broken the law here in Massachusetts and the company finally got caught," said Teamster Local Union 25 President Sean O'Brien. "FedEx Ground drivers in Massachusetts are standing up to this company and winning. We are proud to welcome the drivers in the Wilmington, Mass., terminal as brothers and sisters in Local 25."

FedEx Home Delivery drivers in Wilmington, Mass., voted to join Teamster Local Union 25 and in Hartford, Conn., voted to join Teamster Local Union 671. FedEx has refused to bargain with Local 25 the legally-certified collective bargaining agent; the company has appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit to contest this certification.

SOURCE International Brotherhood of Teamsters


----------------------------------------------

Donna De La Cruz of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
 +1-202-624-8721
 ddelacruz@teamster.org

FEMA Inspectors that worked 911

FEMA Inspectors that worked 911 your health is your life.

 
 I encourage you to take the steps to protect it and get involved in the fight to get help and protection for your self and possibly your family's financial future in the evnet the worse case scenario happens to you. We already have inspectors that have passed away and it looks like it is related ot working 911. Click on comments for full story.

FEMA Fakes a press conference

October 27, 2007 - 11:23am.

Agency and White House scramble to recover from screw-up

Perhaps FEMA should stand for "Fake Every Morning & Afternoon."

Officials of the embattled emergency management agency openly admit they screwed the pooch by holding a fake "news" conference, filling the room with staff members posing as reporters.

Both FEMA and the Bush Administration scrambled Friday to try and recover from trying to pass propaganda off as news: Another black eye for an error-prone administration.

But their excuses fell on deaf ears.

Reports Reuters:

The main U.S. disaster-response agency apologized on Friday for having its employees pose as reporters in a news briefing on California's wildfires that no journalists attended.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency, still struggling to restore its image after the bungled handling of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, issued the apology after The Washington Post published details of the Tuesday briefing.

"We can and must do better, and apologize for this error in judgment," FEMA deputy administrator Harvey Johnson, who conducted the briefing, said in a statement. "Our intent was to provide useful information and be responsive to the many questions we have received."

No actual reporter attended the hastily called news conference in person, although some camera crews arrived late to film incidental shots, officials said.

A spokeswoman for Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who has authority over FEMA, called the incident "inexcusable and offensive to the secretary."

"We have made it clear that stunts such as this will not be tolerated or repeated," spokeswoman Laura Keehner said. She said the department was considering reprimands.

The White House said: "It was just a bad way to handle it." The Bush administration has faced criticism previously over accusations it masked public relations efforts as journalism.

Although both Certoff and the White House tried Friday to distance themselves from the debacle, sources within the Bush administration say both were aware of the fake press conference before it was held.

Class Action Lawsuit against Parsons Brinckerhoff/ Alltech and Dewberry Companies/ PaRR

I have great news for you on getting your overtime wages and your expenses for all the FEMA Jobs
you have worked for in the recent past allowed by the law. For many of you this maybe in the tens  of thousands of dollars coming directly to you.
At this time several governmental agencies have determined that FEMA Inspectors of PaRR and PB/ Alltech who worked on FEMA jobs are actually employees under the law.
Our Attorney is either forming multiple individual cases or a class action against PaRR and PB/ Alltech alleging they misclassified inspectors as independent contractors

So! tell us what you think about this money coming to you? $$$$$$$$$$$

 

Were you short changed by Parsons Brinckerhoff/Alltech for your Performance Bonus?

Some people were either short changed or denied their performance bonus. For some of those that were denied PB/Alltech Hugh Ingles has stated that they will not get a performance bonus if they are not in good standing with PB/Alltech. Did this happen to you? How would you like to not pay your bills just because you did not like the person you owed money too. Hugh Ingles please understand that it is called a Performance Bonus.  PB/Alltech should pay what they owe FEMA Inspectors. This is of course a perfect example of why under Hugh Ingles leadership FEMA Inspectors are doing everything they can to obtain justice.